Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Web fonts talk online

The text and the slides for the talk I gave last night at London Web Standards are online.

In the talk I gave suggestions about how to get started with web fonts which are still a bit of a mess. I’ve also cited a lot of very helpful information on the net so you can get much more detail on the topics I covered. I’ve also stuck the html, css and js test files I used on there. Comments and corrections most welcome.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, October 30, 2009

Understanding Web Fonts: book proposal

Comments on this proposal appreciated.

Synopsis

This short book will offer a guide to anyone who wants to understand and implement web fonts. Its practical section will concentrate on WOFF fonts which seem overwhelmingly likely to offer the most future-aware and ideology-free format. The goal will be to give web designers and developers a clear understanding of the new technology, so they know when and how to implement it.

The Project

I would like to invite collaborators and contributors personally, but anyone who wants to contribute is welcome to contact me as project originator so we can compare notes.

The text will be written online, although see http://www.socialbysocial.com/book/creation-social-by-social

It will be published under GNU Free Documentation License, v1.3 or later, and the copyright will be held by ‘Contributors to the Webfonts book’.

A commercial publishing agreement will be sought. This would be comparable to the agreements for books like Version control with Subversion and Pro Git. If the book is published commercially then any royalties will be distributed between contributors involved in each static release (== print edition). http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html

To set the topic in context it will give in about 10,000 words

  • an outline of the history of the technology
  • an explanation of advantages, both perceived and real
  • a guide to the history of typeface publishing, to explain where the special problems come from
  • a concise set of use cases for web fonts:
    • graphic design and branding considerations (the major commercial drivers)
    • academic research into ancient languages and transliterated documents that use obsolete characters
    • minority languages (those poorly supported by operating systems: the Indian subcontinent, for example)

The main text of the book, which is at a first guess estimated at 15,000 words or so, would provide

  • technical info about the preferred format, WOFF, as a set of references to, and elaboration of, documentation emerging online (eg the Kew/Leming/van Blokland WOFF spec, the W3C Web Fonts group charter and Candidate Recommendation pages)
  • howtos for authors wanting to
    • use cloud font services like Typekit
    • make WOFF fonts, including advice on subsetting for lower bandwidth/faster rendering
    • host web fonts
    • create style rules that encompass the widest range of user agents
    • understand their legal rights and obligations when using commercial web fonts

Then, as it is very early days, we may speculate briefly on what will happen in the future in about 5,000 words:

  • impact on the web
  • impact on the font publishing world
  • Fine typography in user agents, eg the Mozilla demo by Jonathan Kew. http://bit.ly/3sXGLh
  • an opportunity for free/libre fonts?

References

Documentation
Demos
Discussions
EOT Lite [CWT], Mozilla et al
Discussion/analysis: oldish but set context

Edit: corrected heading hierarchy

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Green lights ahead for WOFF web fonts

OK, following an entertaining summer of debate on the www-fonts list at W3C and elsewhere, things are moving along nicely now in the world of web fonts. Yesterday saw two significant announcements:

A key benefit of WOFF is that it carries metadata and this metadata doesn’t have to stick to a rigid set of predefined fields. That leaves the door open for people to expose some of the information about publishing and rights which is usually hidden: stuff like who drew the outlines and when. In the case of remixed permissively-licensed fonts (using the SIL OFL for example) it could also include a log of which other open fonts were mixed, matched and modified to produce the end result. Think Zlicko, Deck, Barnbrook and co for the network age.

And yes, Microsoft is coming to the party. Hopefully without stinkbombs.

Labels: , , ,

TCO